Obama on the offensive

For those of you that are worried about recent fluctuations in tracking polls, take heart. Polls don't always tell us the complete story of what's going on out there. What you should be looking at is how the battle is being fought. What may be different? Which candidate is taking the battle to the other? Who is playing defense? And most importantly, who is on the offensive?

Today we have this story which is quite meaningful--"Obama makes bid in 7 longtime Republican states."  http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Obama_make s_bid_in_7_longtime_0804.html

Alaska is young. Georgia, North Carolina and Virginia have growing populations and many black voters. Montana has seen recent Democratic inroads, and North Dakota has sent only Democrats to Congress since 1986. Indiana borders Barack Obama's home state.

If nothing else this offensive onslaught by the Obama camp in these states will make McCain spend much needed resources just to hold on to their own territory, while a victory or 2 by Obama in any of them could easily spell doom for McCain. Moreover just the fact that these states may be up for grab should give everyone an indication of the state of this race. No matter what the MSM or the tracking polls would have us believe, this race is very much being controlled by the democrats. you don't venture out into the territory of your enemy unless you are very confident of your position, and right now that position looks like a very good one for the democrats.

The republicans may bluster about competing in blue states, but all it is, is bluster. They are busy playing defense. They don't have the enthusiasm or the resources to increase their reach in this election.

When Obama is ready to take them on in places like Georgia, Montana and Indiana, you have to know the republicans are scared out of their boots. In recent elections, these are states that the republicans were able to count on as easily as they could breath.

For decades, these states have almost exclusively voted for Republican presidential candidates and have rarely seen any campaign action. Now, thanks in part to demographic and political shifts, they are emerging as new battlegrounds.

Virginia is considered the most vulnerable of the 7, but in my view Montana, and Indiana are right up there as well. Virginia has been trending democrat in recent years, and Obama is very popular there. The black popuation can also be counted on to come out in numbers never before seen, and this is one major reason why all likely voter models can more than likely be thrown out the window.

Furthermore

Democrats say the growing numbers of young left-leaning professionals in the north and the state's large percentage of blacks - one in five - as well as untapped pools of potential voters make Virginia a ripe target for them. More than 4 million people are eligible to vote, but roughly a third are not registered, including a half-million blacks and several hundred thousand people age 18-24.

Montana is another red state where Obama is very popular, and when you add that to the fact that wherever you look in Montana nowadays, you see blue, it looks very good for the Obama team there.

The same is true for Indiana which has been hard hit economically and borders Obama's home state.

And when you add to this the fact that any red state with large numbers of blacks could easily tip to Obama depending on turnout, the situation looks very bleak for McCain and the republicans this time around.

So if anyone thinks that this election is going to resemble the last two, they are going to find themselves completely mistaken. This election is an entirely new ball game. and in the end, we are going to see an entire new direction in this nation, and it may never be the same again after it.



Display:


Re: Obama on the offensive (none / 0)

A lot of those states are headfakes .

Bush and Rove poured a lot of money into blue states in 2000 like NJ , CA , PA thinking they could win and they wasted resources in those states .

Obama seems to have the resources to spend on those states but I really don't think outside of VA , a lot of those states you have up there are truly competitive .

Mccain is not spending anything in many of those states .

Take Montana he hasn't spent a dime there while Obama has spent some and the RCP average is moving back in Mccain's favor.

Now Indiana can be competitive and with Bayh he might win but Mccain is not spending anything there and I think it would still be red in Nov.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 07:47:20 PM EST

Re: Obama on the offensive (2.00 / 1)

You see that's my point, Bush and Rove forced the democrats to spend money in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, not so much in California, but there were more than a few anxious moments in Cali in 2000.

McCain has not yet spent alot in any of these states, but you can be sure he will spend plenty as those races become true battlegrounds.

As of this point, each of those states remain deadlocked within the margin of error.


Definition of a republican moderate---someone who want's only 50 years in Iraq.
by pollbuster on Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 08:02:13 PM EST

Great diary. (1.66 / 3)

I'm really excited at the prospect that we might be able to change the map this year.


Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 09:28:31 PM EST

Re: Obama on the offensive (2.00 / 2)

timing it to run up to the convention and then keep rolling till Nov. not a bad strat


by zerosumgame on Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 09:55:50 PM EST

Re: Obama on the offensive (none / 0)

It's about time!  McCain's been absolutely rolling over him the past few weeks..,  i fear it may be too little, too late...

Perhaps we should go for the "act desperate, pathetic, and unfocused" strategy that worked so well for Hillary near the end and McCain right now...

Strange that a strategy that is so useless in every other aspect of life (dating, job searches) seem to work so well in politics...


by LordMike on Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 10:08:14 PM EST

Re: Obama on the offensive (none / 0)

Too little, too late? What are you talking about. There is no way he is doing too little, and as for too late, there are 3 months to go, it's still in the early innings.


Definition of a republican moderate---someone who want's only 50 years in Iraq.
by pollbuster on Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 10:16:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama on the offensive (none / 0)

Obama, and the Democrats in general, have let the Republicans milk this oil drilling scam for over a month with practically no response except for polite dismissal... and now, the scam has taken hold, and people actually believe it!  Now, try to discredit the lie... forget it!  The lie has taken hold for awhile...


by LordMike on Mon Aug 04, 2008 at 11:31:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama on the offensive (none / 0)

And this is your too little, to late--talk about too little.


Definition of a republican moderate---someone who want's only 50 years in Iraq.
by pollbuster on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 12:12:59 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.