a place for debate?
Dear God, what is happening to half of the Democratic Party - anything BO says is wonderful and there is no need for debate?
Even with Jim Cooper driving this truck over the cliff for us?
I guess you believe the poll questions were objective and neutral.
If you indeed believe that, there's nothing to debate with a person such as yourself, or a person such as the diarist. Because it's you people that don't want to debate anything.
debating a poll. You said we're long past the time for debate - which scares me to death if you really believe that!
You guys are the greatest at putting words in peoples' mouths. The point isn't that legitimate debate is unwelcome, but rather that Architek isn't looking for debate, he's looking to demagogue.
You didn't even notice that I'm not vcalzone.
Anyway, as I said there's no possibility of discussion with people like the diarist or anyone else who thinks his "poll" was unbiased.
No, we're into the portion where we need to be debating what Obama should be running on and reexamining his positions. We are past debating which candidate in the primary has a better position on the issues. That argument has been made and a winner has emerged, even if only by a slim margin.
I absolutely think that Obama's platform needs a little bit of shaping going forward. So on that, I think we agree. Obama will adopt some of Clinton's policies, just as if Clinton had won, she'd have taken some ideas from Obama. While this isn't always the case, when the election is this close, the differences in policy must be paid attention to.
I personally don't think he's the strongest candidate.
Even if you completely ignore the incredible dishonesty of his healthcare 'plan'.
